Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:54

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Google Photos albums redesign adds Material 3 Expressive toolbar, QR code sharing - 9to5Google
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
If Iran’s Oil Is Cut Off, China Will Pay the Price - WSJ
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Yankees lose no-hit bid on controversial check swing call - New York Post
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
iOS 26 Includes These Five Smaller Features You Might Have Missed - MacRumors
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.